DonateSupporterVisit Heritage
  • Tūrangawaewae
    Places
  • Tira Māori
    Māori Heritage
  • Poutairangahia
    Archaeology
  • Rauemi
    Resources
  • Mō Tātou
    About Us
  • New Zealand Heritage List
  • Nominate and submit
  • Explore the List
  • National Historic Landmarks
  • Plaques
  • Rainbow List Project
  • Lost heritage
  • Visit Heritage
  • Our properties
  • Turnbull House Project
  • Collections
  • Shop
  • Tohu Whenua
  • Tira Māori
  • Conserving Māori heritage
  • Marae built heritage
  • Māori heritage on the List
  • Hinemihi—Te Hokinga Mai
  • What is archaeology?
  • Is there a site on my property?
  • What are my legal requirements?
  • Affecting an archaeological site
  • Declaring an archaeological site
  • Archaeology FAQs
  • Archaeology Digital Library
  • Archaeology guidelines and templates
  • Resources
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Sustainable management guides
  • Disaster recovery
  • Podcasts & digital resources
  • Education Hub
  • Conservation plans
  • About
  • Board
  • Māori Heritage Council
  • Senior Staff
  • Offices
  • Contact us
  • Careers
  • Covenants
  • Fast-track
  • Corporate documents
  • Currently consulting on
  • Our submissions
  • News
Quick links
Rārangi Kōrero | The List
Explore the List
National Historic Landmarks
Ngā Manawhenua o Aotearoa me ōna Kōrero Tūturu
Quick links
Tapuwae
A Vision for Places of Māori Heritage
Funding for Māori Heritage
Resources
Quick links
Archaeological Authority Portal
Applying for an archaeological authority
Archaeology FAQs
Browse the most frequently asked questions about archaeological authorities and the archaeological process.
Quick links
Quick links
Contact us
Offices
DonateSupporterVisit Heritage
  • Tūrangawaewae
    Places
  • Tira Māori
    Māori Heritage
  • Poutairangahia
    Archaeology
  • Rauemi
    Resources
  • Mō Tātou
    About Us
  • New Zealand Heritage List
  • Nominate and submit
  • Explore the List
  • National Historic Landmarks
  • Plaques
  • Rainbow List Project
  • Lost heritage
  • Visit Heritage
  • Our properties
  • Turnbull House Project
  • Collections
  • Shop
  • Tohu Whenua
  • Tira Māori
  • Conserving Māori heritage
  • Marae built heritage
  • Māori heritage on the List
  • Hinemihi—Te Hokinga Mai
  • What is archaeology?
  • Is there a site on my property?
  • What are my legal requirements?
  • Affecting an archaeological site
  • Declaring an archaeological site
  • Archaeology FAQs
  • Archaeology Digital Library
  • Archaeology guidelines and templates
  • Resources
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Sustainable management guides
  • Disaster recovery
  • Podcasts & digital resources
  • Education Hub
  • Conservation plans
  • About
  • Board
  • Māori Heritage Council
  • Senior Staff
  • Offices
  • Contact us
  • Careers
  • Covenants
  • Fast-track
  • Corporate documents
  • Currently consulting on
  • Our submissions
  • News
Quick links
Rārangi Kōrero | The List
Explore the List
National Historic Landmarks
Ngā Manawhenua o Aotearoa me ōna Kōrero Tūturu
Quick links
Tapuwae
A Vision for Places of Māori Heritage
Funding for Māori Heritage
Resources
Quick links
Archaeological Authority Portal
Applying for an archaeological authority
Archaeology FAQs
Browse the most frequently asked questions about archaeological authorities and the archaeological process.
Quick links
Quick links
Contact us
Offices
  • Places
  • Nominate and submit
  • National Historic Landmarks
  • Places
  • Nominate and submit
  • National Historic Landmarks
  • Tira Māori
  • Conserving Māori heritage
  • Marae built heritage
  • Tira Māori
  • Conserving Māori heritage
  • Marae built heritage
  • Archaeological authorities
  • Archaeology Digital Library
  • Archaeological authorities
  • Archaeology Digital Library
  • All resources
  • Publications
  • Funding
  • All resources
  • Publications
  • Funding
  • FAQs
  • FAQs
Follow us on:
Places
  • Places
  • Nominate and submit
  • National Historic Landmarks
Tira Māori
  • Tira Māori
  • Conserving Māori heritage
  • Marae built heritage
Archaeology
  • Archaeological authorities
  • Archaeology Digital Library
Resources
  • All resources
  • Publications
  • Funding
FAQs
  • FAQs
Follow us on
HomePrivacyTerms and conditionsAbout this site
© Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga 2026.
 
Robertson Stone Walls (Clifton)

Highcliff Road, OTAGO PENINSULA

Private

Historic Place Category 1

List No. 4405

Quick links:
List GalleryLocationDetails
Robertson Stone Walls (Clifton), Otago Peninsula. CC BY-SA 3.0 Image courtesy of commons.wikimedia.org | Benchill | 11/09/2009 | Benchill - Wikimedia Commons
Robertson Stone Walls (Clifton), Otago Peninsula. CC BY-SA 3.0 Image courtesy of commons.wikimedia.org | Benchill | 11/09/2009 | Benchill - Wikimedia Commons

List Entry Information

Overview

Status
Listed

List Entry Status
Historic Place Category 1

Access
Private/No Public Access

List Number
4405

Date Entered
27th July 1988

Date of Effect
27th July 1988

City/District Council
Dunedin City

Region
Otago Region

Detailed List Entry
Significance

Historic Significance

This historic place was registered under the Historic Places Act 1980. The following text is the original citation considered by the NZHPT Board at the time of registration. Information in square brackets indicates modifications made after the paper was considered by the HNZPT Board. Historical Significance or Value One of the first major tasks of the settlers on the Otago Peninsula was to clear their land of both trees and stones. Even farmers who did not or could not build walls piled stones along boundaries and into heaps. The walls not only provided durable, low maintenance fences but also shelter around houses and yards and along ridge lines. Stone walling was a traditional skill for many of the farmers who came from Scotland, and a desire to create a familiar landscape may also have encouraged wall building. Wire for fencing did not become common until after 1880 and required cash to buy, whereas collecting stones off the fields cost only the labour involved. There is little historical evidence about the identities of the professional fencing contractors who built stone walls on the Peninsula but who were not qualified masons. Their existence is deduced from the quality of the walls which local farmers such as Ian Robertson sat were built by professional wallers and not by stone masons. The latter were trained to dress stone and mortar the blocks for which they were paid higher wages than a fencing contractor. Stone walls known to have been made by masons tend to be on farms which they themselves owned, such as William Dick's at Sandymount and James Baird's at Mihiwaka. Stone walls thought to have been built by farmers untrained in walling are much poorer in quality and now decayed. The quality of the Robertson stone walls varies sufficiently to suggest that different wallers built them. [The farm was taken up by the Stuart family whose descendants have owned the farm ever since. Ian Robertson is the great-grandson of the original settler and he and his wife, Pat, lived on the property until their retirement, when their son took over the farm].

Physical Significance

Architectural Significance: Simple vernacular structures. Townscape/Landmark Significance: Stone walls occur around Dunedin wherever lava flows have left boulders in arable fields. They occur in distinct groupings on these flows and give the landscape of such places as the Otago Peninsula, Mount Cargill and Wakari and unusual and characteristic pattern.

Construction Details

Start Year

1896

Type

Original Construction

Construction Materials

The wall along the road boundary at Clifton is protected under the Dunedin District Scheme though it is not the best wall on the property. The walls down the driveway and along the south boundary of the property are taller and better built. In general though the Clifton walls are good examples of the better stone walls prevalent on the Otago Peninsula. The average height of the driveway walls is 1.75 metres, and the walls are about one metre wide at the base reducing to about 0.66 metres at the coping. There is a total length of about 1.6 kilometres of wall, including the road and driveway walls and sections on the south and lower boundaries. The stones used are the undressed, grey, rounded, volcanic boulders removed from the adjacent fields. (An important effect of stone walling was to clear the fields of stones as well as create stock fences.) The courses tend to be ungraded and relatively uneven, with sometimes uncrossed joints. The coping is made of even large through stones, projecting slightly on either side.

Notable Features

The height of the walls, their professional construction and good repair.

Physical Description

Architect/engineer/designer: Professional wallers of varying skills, names not known, employed by the Stuart family over about 30 years. Architectural Description (style): These walls are Galloway double dykes, that is they are the type of stone field wall built in south west Scotland in which two faces of carefully placed large stones are built up leaning towards one another with a fill of smaller stones in the centre. Modifications: Wallheads and gate ends are starting to decay but some have been repaired. Part of the wall near the main gate was knocked down by a vehicle and has been rebuilt by Ian Robertson. There is a tendency for passers by to take stones away from the top of the wall. In general the state of repair is good though there are some gaps which have been filled with other materials.

Reference

Information Sources

New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT)

New Zealand Historic Places Trust

Report Written By

This historic place was registered under the Historic Places Act 1980. This report includes the text from the original Building Classification Committee report considered by the NZHPT Board at the time of registration. Please note that entry on the New Zealand Heritage List/Rarangi Korero identifies only the heritage values of the property concerned, and should not be construed as advice on the state of the property, or as a comment of its soundness or safety, including in regard to earthquake risk, safety in the event of fire, or insanitary conditions.

Further Information

Current Usages

Former Usages

General Usage:: Civic Facilities

Specific Usage: Wall/Fence

Themes

Web Links

Overview

Status

Listed

List Entry Status

Historic Place Category 1

Access

Private/No Public Access

List Number

4405

Date Entered

27th July 1988

Date of Effect

27th July 1988

City/District Council

Dunedin City

Region

Otago Region

Status

Listed

List Entry Status

Historic Place Category 1

Access

Private/No Public Access

List Number

4405

Date Entered

27th July 1988

Date of Effect

27th July 1988

City/District Council

Dunedin City

Region

Otago Region

Significance

Why is this place significant?

Historic Significance

This historic place was registered under the Historic Places Act 1980. The following text is the original citation considered by the NZHPT Board at the time of registration. Information in square brackets indicates modifications made after the paper was considered by the HNZPT Board. Historical Significance or Value One of the first major tasks of the settlers on the Otago Peninsula was to clear their land of both trees and stones. Even farmers who did not or could not build walls piled stones along boundaries and into heaps. The walls not only provided durable, low maintenance fences but also shelter around houses and yards and along ridge lines. Stone walling was a traditional skill for many of the farmers who came from Scotland, and a desire to create a familiar landscape may also have encouraged wall building. Wire for fencing did not become common until after 1880 and required cash to buy, whereas collecting stones off the fields cost only the labour involved. There is little historical evidence about the identities of the professional fencing contractors who built stone walls on the Peninsula but who were not qualified masons. Their existence is deduced from the quality of the walls which local farmers such as Ian Robertson sat were built by professional wallers and not by stone masons. The latter were trained to dress stone and mortar the blocks for which they were paid higher wages than a fencing contractor. Stone walls known to have been made by masons tend to be on farms which they themselves owned, such as William Dick's at Sandymount and James Baird's at Mihiwaka. Stone walls thought to have been built by farmers untrained in walling are much poorer in quality and now decayed. The quality of the Robertson stone walls varies sufficiently to suggest that different wallers built them. [The farm was taken up by the Stuart family whose descendants have owned the farm ever since. Ian Robertson is the great-grandson of the original settler and he and his wife, Pat, lived on the property until their retirement, when their son took over the farm].

Physical Significance

Architectural Significance: Simple vernacular structures. Townscape/Landmark Significance: Stone walls occur around Dunedin wherever lava flows have left boulders in arable fields. They occur in distinct groupings on these flows and give the landscape of such places as the Otago Peninsula, Mount Cargill and Wakari and unusual and characteristic pattern.

Why is this place significant?

Historic Significance

This historic place was registered under the Historic Places Act 1980. The following text is the original citation considered by the NZHPT Board at the time of registration. Information in square brackets indicates modifications made after the paper was considered by the HNZPT Board. Historical Significance or Value One of the first major tasks of the settlers on the Otago Peninsula was to clear their land of both trees and stones. Even farmers who did not or could not build walls piled stones along boundaries and into heaps. The walls not only provided durable, low maintenance fences but also shelter around houses and yards and along ridge lines. Stone walling was a traditional skill for many of the farmers who came from Scotland, and a desire to create a familiar landscape may also have encouraged wall building. Wire for fencing did not become common until after 1880 and required cash to buy, whereas collecting stones off the fields cost only the labour involved. There is little historical evidence about the identities of the professional fencing contractors who built stone walls on the Peninsula but who were not qualified masons. Their existence is deduced from the quality of the walls which local farmers such as Ian Robertson sat were built by professional wallers and not by stone masons. The latter were trained to dress stone and mortar the blocks for which they were paid higher wages than a fencing contractor. Stone walls known to have been made by masons tend to be on farms which they themselves owned, such as William Dick's at Sandymount and James Baird's at Mihiwaka. Stone walls thought to have been built by farmers untrained in walling are much poorer in quality and now decayed. The quality of the Robertson stone walls varies sufficiently to suggest that different wallers built them. [The farm was taken up by the Stuart family whose descendants have owned the farm ever since. Ian Robertson is the great-grandson of the original settler and he and his wife, Pat, lived on the property until their retirement, when their son took over the farm].

Physical Significance

Architectural Significance: Simple vernacular structures. Townscape/Landmark Significance: Stone walls occur around Dunedin wherever lava flows have left boulders in arable fields. They occur in distinct groupings on these flows and give the landscape of such places as the Otago Peninsula, Mount Cargill and Wakari and unusual and characteristic pattern.

Construction Information

Construction Details

Start Year

1896

Type

Original Construction

Construction Materials

The wall along the road boundary at Clifton is protected under the Dunedin District Scheme though it is not the best wall on the property. The walls down the driveway and along the south boundary of the property are taller and better built. In general though the Clifton walls are good examples of the better stone walls prevalent on the Otago Peninsula. The average height of the driveway walls is 1.75 metres, and the walls are about one metre wide at the base reducing to about 0.66 metres at the coping. There is a total length of about 1.6 kilometres of wall, including the road and driveway walls and sections on the south and lower boundaries. The stones used are the undressed, grey, rounded, volcanic boulders removed from the adjacent fields. (An important effect of stone walling was to clear the fields of stones as well as create stock fences.) The courses tend to be ungraded and relatively uneven, with sometimes uncrossed joints. The coping is made of even large through stones, projecting slightly on either side.

Notable Features

The height of the walls, their professional construction and good repair.

Construction Details

Start Year

1896

Type

Original Construction

Construction Materials

The wall along the road boundary at Clifton is protected under the Dunedin District Scheme though it is not the best wall on the property. The walls down the driveway and along the south boundary of the property are taller and better built. In general though the Clifton walls are good examples of the better stone walls prevalent on the Otago Peninsula. The average height of the driveway walls is 1.75 metres, and the walls are about one metre wide at the base reducing to about 0.66 metres at the coping. There is a total length of about 1.6 kilometres of wall, including the road and driveway walls and sections on the south and lower boundaries. The stones used are the undressed, grey, rounded, volcanic boulders removed from the adjacent fields. (An important effect of stone walling was to clear the fields of stones as well as create stock fences.) The courses tend to be ungraded and relatively uneven, with sometimes uncrossed joints. The coping is made of even large through stones, projecting slightly on either side.

Notable Features

The height of the walls, their professional construction and good repair.

Physical Description

Architect/engineer/designer: Professional wallers of varying skills, names not known, employed by the Stuart family over about 30 years. Architectural Description (style): These walls are Galloway double dykes, that is they are the type of stone field wall built in south west Scotland in which two faces of carefully placed large stones are built up leaning towards one another with a fill of smaller stones in the centre. Modifications: Wallheads and gate ends are starting to decay but some have been repaired. Part of the wall near the main gate was knocked down by a vehicle and has been rebuilt by Ian Robertson. There is a tendency for passers by to take stones away from the top of the wall. In general the state of repair is good though there are some gaps which have been filled with other materials.

Architect/engineer/designer: Professional wallers of varying skills, names not known, employed by the Stuart family over about 30 years. Architectural Description (style): These walls are Galloway double dykes, that is they are the type of stone field wall built in south west Scotland in which two faces of carefully placed large stones are built up leaning towards one another with a fill of smaller stones in the centre. Modifications: Wallheads and gate ends are starting to decay but some have been repaired. Part of the wall near the main gate was knocked down by a vehicle and has been rebuilt by Ian Robertson. There is a tendency for passers by to take stones away from the top of the wall. In general the state of repair is good though there are some gaps which have been filled with other materials.

Reference

Historical and Associated Iwi / Hapū / Whānau

Information Sources

New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT)

New Zealand Historic Places Trust

Other Information

This historic place was registered under the Historic Places Act 1980. This report includes the text from the original Building Classification Committee report considered by the NZHPT Board at the time of registration. Please note that entry on the New Zealand Heritage List/Rarangi Korero identifies only the heritage values of the property concerned, and should not be construed as advice on the state of the property, or as a comment of its soundness or safety, including in regard to earthquake risk, safety in the event of fire, or insanitary conditions.

Historical and Associated Iwi / Hapū / Whānau

Information Sources

New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT)

New Zealand Historic Places Trust

Other Information

This historic place was registered under the Historic Places Act 1980. This report includes the text from the original Building Classification Committee report considered by the NZHPT Board at the time of registration. Please note that entry on the New Zealand Heritage List/Rarangi Korero identifies only the heritage values of the property concerned, and should not be construed as advice on the state of the property, or as a comment of its soundness or safety, including in regard to earthquake risk, safety in the event of fire, or insanitary conditions.

Further Information

Former Usages

General Usage: Civic Facilities

Specific Usage: Wall/Fence

Former Usages

General Usage: Civic Facilities

Specific Usage: Wall/Fence

Location

Loading
Sign up to hear more

Get the latest heritage news, features and events delivered
straight to your inbox.

Subscribe