The typical features of the Californian bungalow seen here include the stone verandah post, the deep porch, the wide eaves, the horizontal lines of the building, the window hoods, the exposed rafters on the gables, and the dark exterior. Inside the house the halls, living room and breakfast room are panelled in rimu with a 'plate shelf' running around them. The ceilings feature exposed rafters.
Canterbury river stones were used for the verandah pillars, the chimneys, and the roadside fences, which are also included as part of the New Zealand Historic Places Trust/Pouhere Taonga registration. (The fence was moved and rebuilt due to road widening in 1992).
'Los Angeles' is highly significant as the earliest distinct example of a Californian bungalow in New Zealand. The advent of the bungalow is associated world wide with a more relaxed lifestyle, a growth in suburban living and ideas of 'town planning' and 'garden cities'. These changes are allied with a growth in private motor cars and public transport, making it easier for people to live away from the central city. In New Zealand the bungalow became the typical building of the suburbs and the construction of 'Los Angeles' is important as early evidence of the architectural expression of this developing trend.



List Entry Information
Status
Listed
List Entry Status
Historic Place Category 1
Access
Private/No Public Access
List Number
3680
Date Entered
2nd April 1985
Date of Effect
2nd April 1985
City/District Council
Christchurch City
Region
Canterbury Region
Legal description
Pt Lot 5, DP 2120
Status
Listed
List Entry Status
Historic Place Category 1
Access
Private/No Public Access
List Number
3680
Date Entered
2nd April 1985
Date of Effect
2nd April 1985
City/District Council
Christchurch City
Region
Canterbury Region
Legal description
Pt Lot 5, DP 2120
Construction Professional
Name
Guthrie, John Steele and Maurice James
Type
Architect
Biography
'John Steele Guthrie (1883 - 1946) and Maurice James Guthrie (1891 - 1968) were one of Christchurch's most active architectural firms in the first half of [the twentieth] century. John, better known as 'Jack', trained in Christchurch with either J.C. Maddison or F.J. Barlow. By 1910 he was working in independent practice. In June 1919 his brother Maurice, who trained with Collins and Harman, joined the practice, although Jack remained the senior partner and designer. Their designs include 'Los Angeles' in Fendalton Road (1913), St Mary's Convent (1919), the now demolished Edmond's Factory (1920) and Christchurch Boys' High School (1926). The partnership was dissolved in 1929.' University of Canterbury, 'Arts and Crafts Churches of Canterbury', [Christchurch], 1996, p.14
Construction Details
Start Year
1909
startYearCirca
Finish Year
1913
finishYearCirca
Type
Original Construction
Description
Exact year uncertain.
Start Year
1992
Type
Relocation
Description
Fence moved due to road widening
Construction Professional
Name
Guthrie, John Steele and Maurice James
Type
Architect
Biography
'John Steele Guthrie (1883 - 1946) and Maurice James Guthrie (1891 - 1968) were one of Christchurch's most active architectural firms in the first half of [the twentieth] century. John, better known as 'Jack', trained in Christchurch with either J.C. Maddison or F.J. Barlow. By 1910 he was working in independent practice. In June 1919 his brother Maurice, who trained with Collins and Harman, joined the practice, although Jack remained the senior partner and designer. Their designs include 'Los Angeles' in Fendalton Road (1913), St Mary's Convent (1919), the now demolished Edmond's Factory (1920) and Christchurch Boys' High School (1926). The partnership was dissolved in 1929.' University of Canterbury, 'Arts and Crafts Churches of Canterbury', [Christchurch], 1996, p.14
Construction Details
Start Year
1909
startYearCirca
Finish Year
1913
finishYearCirca
Type
Original Construction
Description
Exact year uncertain.
Start Year
1992
Type
Relocation
Description
Fence moved due to road widening
Historical and Associated Iwi / Hapū / Whānau
Completion Date
9th December 2001
Report Written By
Melanie Lovell-Smith
Information Sources
Ashford, 1994
Jeremy Ashford, The Bungalow in New Zealand, Auckland, 1994
Salmond, 1986
Jeremy Salmond, Old New Zealand Houses 1800-1940, Auckland, 1986, Reed Methuen
Shaw, 1997 (2003)
Peter Shaw, A History of New Zealand Architecture, Auckland, 1997
Other Information
This place was identified as significant under previous legislation with different information requirements. It remains significant under the current legislation. There is opportunity under our legislation and policies to add to this information. Further information about this place may be available from the Southern Regional Office of Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga. Please note that entry on the New Zealand Heritage List/Rarangi Korero identifies only the heritage values of the property concerned, and should not be construed as advice on the state of the property, or as a comment of its soundness or safety, including in regard to earthquake risk, safety in the event of fire, or insanitary conditions.
Historical and Associated Iwi / Hapū / Whānau
Completion Date
9th December 2001
Report Written By
Melanie Lovell-Smith
Information Sources
Ashford, 1994
Jeremy Ashford, The Bungalow in New Zealand, Auckland, 1994
Salmond, 1986
Jeremy Salmond, Old New Zealand Houses 1800-1940, Auckland, 1986, Reed Methuen
Shaw, 1997 (2003)
Peter Shaw, A History of New Zealand Architecture, Auckland, 1997
Other Information
This place was identified as significant under previous legislation with different information requirements. It remains significant under the current legislation. There is opportunity under our legislation and policies to add to this information. Further information about this place may be available from the Southern Regional Office of Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga. Please note that entry on the New Zealand Heritage List/Rarangi Korero identifies only the heritage values of the property concerned, and should not be construed as advice on the state of the property, or as a comment of its soundness or safety, including in regard to earthquake risk, safety in the event of fire, or insanitary conditions.
Current Usages
Uses: Accommodation
Specific Usage: House
Uses: Civic Facilities
Specific Usage: Gate
Uses: Civic Facilities
Specific Usage: Wall/Fence
Former Usages
General Usage: Accommodation
Specific Usage: House
General Usage: Civic Facilities
Specific Usage: Gate
General Usage: Civic Facilities
Specific Usage: Wall/Fence
Current Usages
Uses: Accommodation
Specific Usage: House
Uses: Civic Facilities
Specific Usage: Gate
Uses: Civic Facilities
Specific Usage: Wall/Fence
Former Usages
General Usage: Accommodation
Specific Usage: House
General Usage: Civic Facilities
Specific Usage: Gate
General Usage: Civic Facilities
Specific Usage: Wall/Fence
Location
Stay up to date with Heritage this month

